Political Cartoons

After this past week's political bruhaha over the DNC and McCain's choice of Palin as his running mate I found myself a bit annoyed. I constantly heard everyone talk about first black presidential candidate and first female vp candidate. Rarely have I seen a news source make it clear that this is in regards to the major parties. That's why the cartoon above was nice to see. ...

This website has some good alternative politcal cartoons. By alternative, I mean not mainstream politcal punditry in cartoon form. A perfect example is a recent cartoon about bipartisan militarism in American politics.

For recent entries you should check out their page of new ones.

StudioBendIb is definately worth checking out.

McKinney/Clemente on Democracy Now!

As a member of the Green Party, I feel a bit guilty about my lack of coverage of the Green Party candidates. Sure I've had an article about Kat Swift, Kent Mesplay and Jesse Johnson but the presumptive nominee for a long time has been Cynthia McKinney and I don't know that I've ever made a post about her. Even if I did, all my posts about Green Party candidates pale in comparison to my Ralph Nader/Matt Gonzalez posts. So when I saw that both Cynthia McKinnney and her Vice Presidential running mate Rosa Clemente were on Democracy Now! I made sure to watch. ...

I am a Green Party member, but I currently support Ralph Nader over Cynthia McKinney as his focus is more on the things that matter the most to me. Cynthia McKinney, on the other hand, is doing something I find nearly awe inspiring. She is bringing hip hop activism to the forefront of national politics by announcing Rosa Clemente as her vice presidential running mate. While I am a fan of music in general, the hip hop movement is about more than music and given my suburban white male upbringing it doesn't speak to me as much as I'm sure it does others. I found it educational when I first heard Jared Ball talk about hip hop activism at the Green Party debate in January and now I hope it begins to take hold.

The conversation that is hip hop in politics could very well change the nature of politics in America. Why do politician's have to speak about certain topics and not others? I believe the hip hop movement could, at the very least, give us more to discuss, debate and think about. I found it very intriguing, as a former fan of Public Enemy, to find a video on youTube where Professor Griff talked about why he supports Cynthia McKinney over Barack Obama.

Now how do we get him to vote? There are thousands of people who think just like him, voting doesn't do anything for him so he doesn't vote. There are thousands more people who think similar to him and yet vote for somebody who doesn't even hold the same values. How can we change this? Keep watching Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente and perhaps we will find out.

Green on Green

The following is a video I found when visiting the Green Party's website today. It's a succint look at the 4 Green Party candidates, why they are running Green, why you should vote ( and vote Green ) and the benefits of minor parties running in an election. ...

Seriously Green - Kat Swift

Polidoc Productions is currently working on a documentary called "Seriously Green." It is a documentary about the Green Party candidates running for President in 2008. A while ago I posted a clip of Kent Mesplay that was from this piece. Today I am posting a piece about Kat Swift. A very interesting candidate, Kat will be just old enough to be president on election day. ...

What I like about this clip is two very good points she brings up. The first being the reality of who can run for the office of President. Is it true that anyone can run for President, such as a full time working class citizen, or just the rich? I actually had the thought that a homeless and jobless person could probably run as well but that is a tangent we can go down in the comments section. The second point she makes is that part of why she is running is so that other people will look at her and see that running for local office is very doable.

She may not be my choice to represent the Green Party as a Presidential candidate but I am proud that she represents the Green Party in all ways.

I'm not a Libertarian

This past weekend was the Libertarian Party's National Convention where they chose who their candidate for President and Vice President would be. On Saturday evening I was lucky enough to be changing channels and I caught the Libertarian Presidential Candidate debate. I was able to watch it from the beginning to the end. All in all I was impressed, but I'm also very clear that I am not a Libertarian. ...

I love the basic premise of the Libertarian Party.

Libertarians believe in, and pursue, personal freedom while maintaining personal responsibility.

On that basic premise I can agree with Libertarians. Because of that premise, I love to listen to Libertarians as it is often adds to my knowledge of an issue.

The debate itself was a breath of fresh air. Many different topics were discussed that are not talked about by the major party candidates. Also the selection of candidates was diverse enough that you could tell the difference between each of them. For the most part I liked each and every one of them.

I have already mentioned my support of Mike Gravel, but there are others that I really liked as well. Most notable was Michael Jingozian and Steve Kubby. Really though, I felt good about almost all the candidates. I went to bed that evening thinking I would likely vote Libertarian if the Green Party or Ralph Nader were not on my ballot here in North Carolina. When I saw the results, I realized that I would much rather vote for a major party Democrat over the Libertarian candidates that the party selected.

The Libertarian Party Candidate for President is Bob Barr and the Vice Presidential Candidate is Wayne Allyn Root. I really did not like what I saw from Bob Barr in that one debate( but I will agree that it was just one debate ). Mostly because he had either sponsored or cosponsored some of the most non-libertarian bills before Congress while he was there as a Republican, namely The Patriot Act and The Real ID act. I'm all for giving people second chances and realize that people change their minds but his responses to questions regarding these bills didn't quite go far enough for me. As for Wayne Allyn Root, my main issue with him seemed to be his personality. Perhaps it is a real issue or maybe he just reminds me too much of Biff Tannen. By himself he would be worth voting for against a major party but I feel he doesn't do a good job of balancing the ticket against Bob Barr( though that would be very difficult in my mind ).

All this is a non-issue though. I am not a Libertarian and obviously the candidate selection process does not have to reflect me in any way shape or form. It is as if I expect the Democrats or Republicans to have candidates that reflect my values. It could happen, but if it does it is only chance. I am member of the Green Party, even if it isn't recognized by my state and I support all of their presidential candidates. I have my favorites( ranked choice and all ) but I would vote for any of them over most of the other presidential candidates I am aware of at this point. Of course, the independent in me loves Ralph Nader.

So by November will I be voting for Ralph Nader or for the Green Candidate( most likely Cynthia McKinney ) or will the Libertarians some how change my mind? I don't know. I'm leaving myself open, yet opinionated :)

Debating the Role of Minor Parties

I have always considered myself an independent. When it comes to my party affiliations it wasn't until relatively recently that I decided to choose a team to play with. After my one visit to a Democratic party meeting in my area it was clear I didn't want to be known as a democrat. After some research I chose the Green Party. But what use is it? Here's a short video made by the same people who created "An Unreasonable Man"( In fact it is from that DVDs extras ) talking about the role Minor parties play in the USA. ...

Throwing Votes...Away?

Today I had a political conversation with someone that shares a lot of my political views. While we were discussing how democracy is being overrun by capitalism, I started to talk about what we can do to bring the two back into balance. Since fighting for the people's rights over corporations means standing with candidates who are not mainstream he brought up the point that, unfortunately, you have to vote for the lesser of two evils otherwise you are throwing your vote away. My vehement response,"Hell no it isn't!" got a response of attempting to explain to me why it is. Since we have similar political views, he allowed me the privilege of explaining my reasoning and at the same time why voting for the lesser of two evils would be throwing my vote away. This got me thinking about the many reasons why people might think that not voting for a major party candidate is throwing your vote away. ...

Be Part of a winning team:
Many people just want to be a part of a winning team. When it comes to party politics, even minor party politics, people feel very strongly about their team. From a psychological standpoint, it is understandable. Much like sports rivalries, political party rivalries get in the way of objective thought. Many people have chosen Democrats, many have chosen Republicans and while quite a bit less many have chosen other parties such as Green, Libertarian, Reform, Constitution and oh so many more. Let us not forget all the candidate who choose not to be tied to a party but instead choose to run as Independent, Declined to state, et cetera. These differing groups are representative of the opinions of all types of Americans. It is important that as many of these voices as possible get heard. By voting for a minor party and/or individuals that share your values you give them a better chance of being seen and heard. If you vote Democrat or Republican just because they are more likely to win it just keeps these important voices away from view, unable to make any real difference. Remember that many, if not all, of the most progressive changes in the United States have started from the voices of independents and minor parties.

A Vote for X(non-evil minor candidate) is a vote for Y( the greater evil )
Then there is the reasonable argument that a vote a minor party candidate is a vote for a competing major party candidate because it takes votes away from the lesser evil major party candidate. On the surface, this argument makes sense. It makes sense, especially if you are in say the Democratic party, that someone who says they are going to vote Green or for Ralph Nader would most likely doesn't want to see a Republican in the White House so they should vote for a Democrat to make sure that doesn't happen. This really goes back to the 'Winning Team' argument. People in the Democratic party often mistake all progressives as Democrats while non-Democrat progressives often do not find the main stream Democratic party candidates as very progressive. From what I've read, many Republicans mistakenly think all conservatives are Republicans but many conservatives don't find the main stream Republican candidates conservative enough. It sounds like a whole lot of people need their voices heard, and that isn't going to happen by voting for major party candidates. Besides, a vote for a minor party candidate is only a vote for that candidate because no one else earned that vote. If you want people to rank their votes by preference, take a look at (instant) runoff voting and make it happen.

The reason to vote minor party / independent
If, like me, you were raised that America is the land of the free because of the brave this is a no brainer. Often, people hear( or read ) that statement and think of soldiers only. There is another group of brave men and women, people who stood up to the status quo to change things for the better. Think it's great that a woman has a chance at being president? Women have some brave independent souls to thank for the privilege to even vote. Think it is great that a man of color might be president? Once again, it was independent third parties( abolitionist ) who first brought the idea of ending slavery to the table( Abraham Lincoln was a Republican when that was a minor party ). Don't forget the brave independent thinkers who gave all citizens, regardless of race, the opportunity to vote and run for office. And for those of you who are thinking there is still work to be done, let me tell you, that is status quo getting in your way. I apologize to the conservatives, but being a liberal it is difficult for me to cite examples - oh yeah, Ross Perot actually got a tax and spend Democrat to balance the budget and lead us toward a budget surplus. However, the Commission on Presidential Debates( corporation run by Dems and Reps ) made sure noone heard him debate the 2nd time he ran and in doing so made it near impossible for any minor party or independent candidate to be a part of the national debates.

Voting for a minor party or independent candidate is never a wasted vote. Unless you believe in the democrats or republicans and what they stand for over any other candidate, a vote for a major candidate is a vote thrown away. You have not made them earn your vote. They can now take your vote for granted and go to work for the corporations, which they can't take for granted, instead of you. Write letters, tell them how you feel, it won't make a difference if they can count on getting elected next cycle. I am open to a major party candidate earning my vote. They have until November. Until then I currently have 3 choices, Ralph Nader, whomever the Green Party chooses and Mike Gravel; if the Libertarians choose him as their candidate.

Of course, these are only a couple reasons why people think one way or the other. Do you have another perspective? I would love to hear it. Please comment below.

A little from Kent Mesplay

Kent Mesplay seems to come across as a quieter Presidential candidate from the Green Party. When he speaks though, he comes across as very intelligent. I've liked him since the Green Party debates in January. However, being quiet, I don't hear much from him very often. So I was quite happy to see his name in an article, not as part of a list of Green Party presidential candidates but as the focus of the article. He talks about Nader running as an independent, Jesse Johnson's recent vocal endorsement from Mike Gravel and what Green's need to do to get noticed by the media. ...

Also at the end of the post is a short clip from a documentary called "Seriously Green" so that people can put a face to Kent Mesplay.

And here is a blog radio interview with Kent Mesplay as well. (So you can put a voice to the name I guess :) )

Gravel goes Green

Last week you may have missed it. In the political brouhaha that is American politics during a Presidential election year, you often hear about candidates supporting other candidates but only after they have dropped out. What isn't usually newsworthy is the fact that they always support someone from their own party. So why, when a candidate who hasn't dropped out of the race supports a candidate in another party is there so little news on the event. Well, last week Mike Gravel gave his support to Green Party presidential candidate Jesse Johnson. ...

Like Mike Gravel, when I first saw Jesse Johnson in a debate I wasn't that taken with him. Perhaps it was because he wasn't officially running for president at that time. Sure, he said his first focus was to get the Greens on the ballot in West Virginia but he wasn't officially running so I didn't take him seriously. He was very intelligent and well spoken but until his run was official I just decided not to pay attention.

Recently Jesse Johnson finished getting the Green Party candidates on the ballot in West Virginia, even though the Mountain party ( the Green party affiliate in West Virginia ) has a different name. Way to go Jesse, he can make things happen. That's a bonus in my book.

Then when he is freed up from ensuring a more democratic ballot in the mountain state he did indeed officially announce his run for president. No sooner did that happen then the big new. Mike Gravel,a Democrat still running for President himself, endorses Jesse Johnson for President of the United States. I didn't think an endorsement would make any difference for me, but this one sure did.

Perhaps we'll see more of this. Disenchanted major party candidates supporting minor party candidates. Minor party candidates supporting each other. Joint tickets between minor parties? Okay maybe that is pushing it, I'm open to the idea though.

Why Americans should support third parties

A recent article in The Columbus Dispatch talks about why Americans should support third parties. Here's an excerpt:

Article II of the Constitution states that if no presidential candidate receives a majority of votes, the House is to select the winner "from the five highest on the list." No one in 1787 envisioned presidential elections with only two candidates. The Framers figured that lots of people would run

...

The title of the article highlights a great distinction - support vs. vote for. As you read to the end of the article it is clear that he is not saying you necessarily have to vote for them but having them run is important to our Democracy. Hearing their voices is important to our Democracy. We all can do our part for the country, even if we plan on voting for a major party.

I found this article through a great site that watches the world of third parties non Republican & non Democrats. The simply call themselves Third Party watch.